top of page

The Impact of Aboriginal Title on Land Use in British Columbia

Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Understanding the Recent Court Ruling


On August 7, 2025, the British Columbia Supreme Court (BCSC) issued a judgment in Cowichan Tribes v. Canada (Attorney General), 2025 BCSC 1490. This ruling determined that the Cowichan Tribes, along with associated Nations, hold Aboriginal title over part of their claimed lands on the south and east edge of Lulu Island in Richmond. The area in question encompasses approximately 1,846 acres (≈ 7.5 km²) in the southeastern portion of Richmond. Richmond News+3Mandell Pinder LLP+3Times Colonist+3



Co-existence of Aboriginal Title and Fee-Simple Ownership


The Court held that Aboriginal title and fee-simple ownership can co-exist. However, Aboriginal title is a prior and senior interest. This means that the fee-simple titles of others may be limited or subject to Indigenous rights. Mandell Pinder LLP


This landmark ruling signifies that private property purchases may be considered invalid if a land claim is made. The implications of this decision are profound and far-reaching.


The Challenges of Reconciliation


The court's ruling, along with the Province of BC's adoption of UNDRIP (DRIPA), has set back reconciliation efforts with Indigenous peoples. Premier Eby and the NDP Government are perceived to be excluding BC voters from key public land use decisions. This exclusion threatens to create animosity between First Nations and non-Indigenous BC residents.


The NDP government appears to overlook the proverb, "two wrongs do not make a right." The lack of transparency by the NDP government has been noted in recent news by various groups. These include the Conservative Party of BC, PHARA (Pender Harbour Area Residents Association), and PLUS (Public Land Use Society).


The Role of the South Fraser River Enhancement Society


The South Fraser River Enhancement Society (SFRES) believes that 'true and meaningful' reconciliation with First Nations is only possible through inclusive and transparent processes. SFRES is committed to working collaboratively with First Nations to achieve common goals. These goals include restoring and protecting the secondary channels of the Lower Fraser River.


Importance of Collaboration


Collaboration is essential for the health of the river and the communities that rely on it. By engaging with First Nations, SFRES aims to ensure that all voices are heard. This approach fosters mutual respect and understanding.


The Future of Land Use Decisions


As land use decisions evolve, it is crucial to consider the implications of Aboriginal title. The recent court ruling highlights the need for careful navigation of these complex issues. The future of land use in British Columbia will depend on the ability of all stakeholders to work together.


Conclusion


In conclusion, the ruling in Cowichan Tribes v. Canada (Attorney General) has significant implications for land use in British Columbia. It underscores the importance of recognizing Aboriginal title and the rights of Indigenous peoples. Moving forward, it is essential to foster open dialogue and collaboration among all parties involved. Only through these efforts can we hope to achieve a balanced and equitable approach to land use in the region.


The South Fraser River Enhancement Society remains dedicated to advocating for the health of the South Fraser River. By promoting consistent dredging and maintenance of its secondary channels, SFRES aims to ensure that the river remains safe and navigable for everyone while protecting its health for future generations.

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page